>>15478390i tend to agree
well the article is talking about something that happened in 2020. but it says it was updated today for some reason and the only update was the header image of orban. i'm assuming you're seeing this article from 2020 because someone updated it and it shot up to the top of the paper's feed
me too, i don't get it. even on sweet stuff like french toast.
this is an hour and twenty minutes long
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBzHJDHzCEM>>15478404idk i don't really care about that either way, it doesn't bother me if it's unrealistic or if it could work just as well in a fantasy setting. yeah you could go to the swamps or to the northern regions, but i don't care. maybe it just captivated the boomers' imagination more back in the day, having it be set in space.
but i agree, i've always thought star wars had a problem of scale where the "galaxy" seemed tiny as fuck and everything that ever happened involved a small number of people. say what you will about 40k but at least it felt big and made it clear that you were talking about a galaxy of millions of planets and you could have a story featuring millions of losses and dozens of planets and it was ultimately barely relevant on a galactic scale. in star wars you had everything get decided in a battle that involved like 200 guys.
racist