>>15492659>an algorithmwe have truly come full circle where retards who never zoned in for a single second during any math class think that mathematics requires "algorithms" to prove things.
you'll be shocked to learn that using this brand new technology called mathematics we don't require algorithms to demonstrate properties or equivalences or any other feature.
you prove things based on "logic" alone using much higher order logic than just "add this number to this number in memory :DDD"
despite that, would you be fucking satisfied with a goddamn monte carlo simulation demonstrating the mean is what the page says it is, run to such high numbers that the clt basically abolishes any notion of variance?
you fucking noob. get good. proofs should be required in high school to prevent this kind of insane thinking in retards overexposed to tech but criminally underexposed to the millennia of mathematics that made any of it even possible.
