>>15554226That would be a good point to say for example in a global empire where ares are comprised of thousands of kilometres landmasses, which could also be said of continents themselves, as they are one area, and then another is one area, but multiple could be one area too, but OP clearly stated "which area", singular, and not multiple areas, which would make it null, and more to the point, while all of the landmasses could be made to comprise one area, for example such as a Pangaea, it would be worthy to note that he was most likely looking for who would nuke what area, for example, either Beijing, or California, or Manhattan, though the whole globe itself could be an area, it would not be inaccurate to say that is actually a multitude comprised of areas itself. Therefore, it was most certain that OP was referring to which area of the world should be nuked, not areas, plural.
