>>1558157If one rule was repeatedly and egregiously violated to the annoyance of many, I could see picking one particular instance of it for this treatment. Doesn't work as well with stuff like avatarfagging, but more frequent reminders that low quality posts aren't allowed on certain boards would be useful. It might be an improvement if
>[USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST]included a hyperlink to the specific rule cited in the b&, if any, by default.
