>>15636894I'm sure figures like Alan Turing agree with you.
Imagine being Alan Turing and not actually gay.
What a lark!
You're not part of the "group think" that actively pressures the impressionable to adopt a subserviant identification are you?
Or those that confuse the homosexual issue by making it more complex than "if I get aroused by the sight of genitlia that is the same as my own, I'm carrying Homosexual genes"?