>>15637376>Subverted the Roman Empire?Yes, they subverted the values the empire was founded on and accelerated its decline. Before christianity became the state religion, Rome based its ethical system on the principles of mos maiorum and the do ut des, a mutual agreement between the social castes and the Gods. Christianity disrupted this system because "Christ has sacrificed himself on a cross" so there's no longer need to sacrifice oneself for your superiors or the empire. Also the early christians refused to serve in the army, pushing the emperors to rely on barbarians.
>Your complaining of globohomo is strangeThe empire did not suppress the foreign religions except in rare occasions where they posed a treath for the state, both the globohomo and christianity fought to suppress the native religions of Europe.
>>15638240>enlightenment era thinkers and the modern and post-modern thinkers that stem from it tie more to the ancien authors and more often disregard christian thinkers.The philosophy of the enlightenment thinkers was still heavily influenced by the medieval authors, they would gouge their eyes out if they knew how brutal their ancestors were.
>The system you are suggesting would also be too inhumane.Nah, it would just remove superfluous waste from the genetic pool, you believe that's inhumane because christianity teaches that man is above the animal realm, but in antiquity that wasn't always true and eugenics was regularly practiced.
>If someone sits in the wheelchair and has some hereditary disease there is no legitimacy in just killing them for no reason.Dude, hereditary diseases can be eradicated, Iceland has wiped out autism with successful abortion campaigns.
>It does not benefit societyIt really would, the amount of budget we spend on the disabled could be used for more necessary purposes.
