>>15683461>ad hominem following ad hominem I keep classical philosophy books like Plato and Aristotle on my desk at work. Why don't you provide any book you actually own and have read?
Because if you think it's all about the answers then you need to read more.
>What qualifies something as real?A questioned posed by ancient philosophers that is rather hard to give any answer to without subjecting yourself to looking foolish.
Sterner would pose that any answer would be a spook anyway while Nietzsche would propose that the answer is inherently pointless and unless it affects you directly there's no point to even trying to answer it.
Did you forget that everything is only worth what we give it? Answers are worthless as opposed to asking questions because you may never end up at a good enough answer.
Seriously kid piss up a rope.
