[174 / 48 / 62]
Quoted By: >>15835204 >>15835206 >>15835207 >>15835211 >>15835214 >>15835216 >>15835218 >>15835220 >>15835221 >>15835230 >>15835231 >>15835237 >>15835253 >>15835255 >>15835257 >>15835264 >>15835270 >>15835272 >>15835276 >>15835280 >>15835283 >>15835288 >>15835294 >>15835301 >>15835304 >>15835308 >>15835313 >>15835317 >>15835348 >>15835359 >>15836663
Nothing Jewish existed prior to arrival of Romans. Jews occurred as a reaction to the new Roman concept of Rule of Law, to "game" that system as continues to this day. ALL current Govts are descended from Roman. Prior to Romans everyone was Canaanite, which was a real culture that left behind real pottery, statues of their gods, and recorded by other cultures. Nothing of what is today Jewish "religion" existed prior to about 400AD.
Also, nothing Christian exists prior to about 1000AD. Everything claimed is handful of dubious "stretched" artifacts. No evidence Romans crucified anyone, much less thousands along roads for miles when putting down slave revolts. All their is is one child's graffiti of a guy with horse's head on a stand and one Roman grave with a nail through one ankle bone. There are a few "fragments" claimed prior to 1000AD claimed to be New Testament but:
1)most haven't been Carbon-14 dated. OK, they have been dated but results have been kept secret, for obvious reasons. Its POSSIBLE later dating is caused by contamination. Parchment from 400AD gets cleaned or conditioned with tallow from 1500AD, etc.
2)Was the WRITING dated or was it put on old paper later?
3)Does in come from New Testament or is it parable/tale later post 1000AD to construct NT?
THEN, after 1000AD we get scads of clearly "Jesus on the Cross" paintings, statues, stained glass, etc and full New Testaments.
Since Jesus is mentioned more than Mohammad in Koran that means Islam didn't exist prior to 1000AD and archeology on that also checks out. Some Muslim buildings pre-date 1000AD but everything Islamic was "remodeled later" after 1000AD.
Note much of this is exact match to The Holocaust(tm). "Most documented" always ends up being created out of whole cloth much after the fact mostly by people who were never there, history books from history books circle jerk.
Also, nothing Christian exists prior to about 1000AD. Everything claimed is handful of dubious "stretched" artifacts. No evidence Romans crucified anyone, much less thousands along roads for miles when putting down slave revolts. All their is is one child's graffiti of a guy with horse's head on a stand and one Roman grave with a nail through one ankle bone. There are a few "fragments" claimed prior to 1000AD claimed to be New Testament but:
1)most haven't been Carbon-14 dated. OK, they have been dated but results have been kept secret, for obvious reasons. Its POSSIBLE later dating is caused by contamination. Parchment from 400AD gets cleaned or conditioned with tallow from 1500AD, etc.
2)Was the WRITING dated or was it put on old paper later?
3)Does in come from New Testament or is it parable/tale later post 1000AD to construct NT?
THEN, after 1000AD we get scads of clearly "Jesus on the Cross" paintings, statues, stained glass, etc and full New Testaments.
Since Jesus is mentioned more than Mohammad in Koran that means Islam didn't exist prior to 1000AD and archeology on that also checks out. Some Muslim buildings pre-date 1000AD but everything Islamic was "remodeled later" after 1000AD.
Note much of this is exact match to The Holocaust(tm). "Most documented" always ends up being created out of whole cloth much after the fact mostly by people who were never there, history books from history books circle jerk.