>>15839242>>15839371Yeah that's my take as well. Well, it seems so self-evident. That's the position I held for years but just to be intellectually honest I watched these some anon posted here
https://youtu.be/w5SICzoFDAkhttps://youtu.be/ZsnmX0XRNTkBasically, the calculation of drop should be observed but it isnt. And that's really weird.
Maybe the Earth is much larger than were being told.
But then you have phenomena that dont work on a flat earf like when you pass the equator and into another hemisphere and new constellations are observed. Flat model cant explain that.
And the orbit of planets in our solar system is totally fucked with a flat geocentric model and only makes sense and comes together with a heliocentric framework.
This video shows a rocket making it to space showing curvature
https://youtu.be/001IXnp0ogcBut this guys says, Na aint no curve
https://youtu.be/-KC0f0XIalkBut the question is was a fisheye lens used? Idk Probably. "They" always use fish eye lenses and it is really irritating - I actually don't know anything about this rocket launch I've just been too lazy to check because I'm not too deeply invested in this subject. However Antarctica is weird:
https://youtu.be/JUPX6AjB7EgAnd flight routes don't make sense
https://youtu.be/TmUl4UyBKigCountless tests have been done by amateur researchers using every correct tool and scientific method available, and still come out to the same conclusion, which is that they are observing no curvature and seeing mountains and other targets in the distance which should be hidden by miles of curvature. I dont know. I would like to believe that the Earth is an oblate spheroid. We see this when we look at planets in our system, and they are rotating on an axis and a bunch of dirt and shit isn't flying off of them like flat earthers claim, and they appear to be rotating around the Sun - why wouldn't our planet be doing the same - why would we be such an anomaly? But the Flatters have a case
