Post I wrote in response before jannies deleted my thread.

>It absolutely does. Because this is where the cracks in your argument start. If you can't define God then there's no argument.
A god is a perfect entity. All powerful, and omniscient, various gods will have different morals, but these are two bases of an actual god that could have a chance of 'existing' These are necessary for the creation and sustaining of the universe. This is the baseline of the Christian God, and the Spinozan God.
>All presuppositions. Can you demonstrate how you know its one god?
You completely missed the mark of "For this argument it doesn't matter "which god" It could be 1 god it could be 50 gods that collaborated on the creation of the universe, it doesn't change my argument in the slightest. No I can't definitively proof which god it was, or how many, but I can prove that it requires A GOD. Then from there you just look at the ones that have the highest probability of existing, which I firmly believe in the Christian Deity.

>Now, explain why it's an opinion?
See above? Yes I have presuppositions, because I have knowledge about this before this argument. Are you thick? That's like arguing with an engineer about how to design something , saying you want to hear his opinion on why he thinks method A is better than method B, and then refusing all knowledge he had before the argument. Of course I have presuppositions, especially since you haven't said anything other than "BuT wHiCh GoD iS iT??"

>And yes it's my favorite God because I have faith.
>>Now, explain why it's an opinion?
You just did

No I gave an opinion on why I think it's the CHRISTIAN GOD, stop begin retarded.