>>16016416>AI-generated women could cause women's beauty standards to skyrocketThis is such a bad take. Such standards have always been artificially high. The expectations of both men and women have been extremely high. There is zero sense of normalcy in modern day beauty standards. They are extremes. Look at Nazi beauty standards. Portraits of plump plain women, sometimes stern or happy, but they looked normal. They weren't beach bodies with big tits and wide hips. They were normal, aesthetic but plain women in normal clothing. The men had strong jaws but weren't muscle-bound steroid-wrecked artificial people.
Beauty standards have to be reachable, there can be an upper echelon, but if the standard isn't reachable, then it becomes alien and impossible, so people given up, or take the surgery route.
We don't want nor need extrem beatuty standards. We need women and men to accept who they are, love who and what they are, and try to reach the best they are actually capable of. Normal, healthy, fit people in normal clothing. Plain people, without surgery, fakery or overdone make up.
Increasing extreme beauty standards will only lead to more unimmersive interpretations. The systems anti-beautfy standards are equally disgusting. Rather than have normal people, they adopt UGLINESS. Reject all of these extremes. Most people are normal and aesthetic if they were simply physically fit. That is an immersive standard everyone can emulate. And of course, among those will be our organic beauty that are above others, and those cna be promoted too as the peak of those above average can aim for.
