>>16021429Evolution is not real that's why it's STILL referred to as "the THEORY of evolution."
For some reason they leave that part out when they try to smack people across the face with "the science".
Also according to evolution, mutations are "random" and not at all related to environmental stressors. So according to evolution "theory", the giraffe in your case just one day came to magically sprout a long neck for no apparent purpose, and "by random luck" just happened to realize there's shit in trees it can eat.
Of course, then if you consider the "random mutations" part of evolution as "random adaptations" that "compete to see which random adaptation best survives in the environment", then you should also expect to be able to go to museums and see giraffe skeletons with 5 heads, or 20 wings, or centipede giraffes or some shit.
But you don't.
If you try to ask (((people))) who push "the theory of evolution" how to reconcile this glaring lack of evidence of what according to the theory should exist in troves, they just roll their eyes at you and ad hominem your ass with scoffs and elbow nudges to the closest available onlooker to your asking a simple question that they should be able to answer, but can't seem to.
(((They))) love this theory because of the circular reasoning it entails, ie, "survival of the fittest". So if they were there a long time ago, and they're here now, they "must be fitter" than anyone else and so that proves their religious beliefs because "see, we ARE chosen". Until something threatens their existence. Like waking up to realize that they don't push this theory because they believe in it so much as they do to beat you over the head for not "adopting" to their never-ending economic musical chairs game. Feel comfy? Get up we have a new economic tune. Didn't find a chair? Aww, it's nobody's fault, you're just "not fit". It's "nature" don't you know. Except if it threatens their survival. Then it's not nature. Then it's "antisemitism."
