>>16029215you must view the actions of the character from the perspective of an autocratic enlightenment monarchy
reinhard was interested in being seen as a legitimate monarch by his new subjects, so he kept the republic around so that the corrupt government would delegitimise itself and the populace would be more willing to accept the rule of the monarchy.
>>16029230>Gibfig do you think the west will go to a fascist movement after heavy democracy just like how rodolf rose to power? I am not gapfag. Fascism taking over Europe was the natural evolution of the political system that was interrupted by American intervention. From the point we are, it would take longer to reemerge or take on a wholly different form. I think it is totally inevitable regardless of how far away it seems to be.
>Would you support this?The only system I support is the monarchy that was created by Carolus Magnus in the Christmas of 800. This monarchy ceased to have a ruler in 1806. Every government that has succeeded it was some degree of illegitimate. For example, the “King of Bavaria” had no legitimate right to style himself as a King, and the “German Emperor” had no right to style himself as an emperor.
The currect german republic styles itself as the best Germany that has ever existed, but it is just idiocy from the bottom to the top. In 2015 I had the hope that the incompetence of the government would finally sway the population to the right, and maybe cause a popular uprising, but it has not been successful so far. Aynway, Germany is not the absolute center of history and change could come from somewhere else and hopefully take over here too. Whether the German people will it or not
