>>16079570>The native were also massively killed by the natives.Not even possible on a comparable scale. Don't try.
>Europeans had to build everything and that was harder than conquering an already developed land, say Haiti.Haiti's infrastructure was devoted entirely to sugar extraction. If your entire revolt was meant to end the blood-for-sugarcane trade, that's going to be useless for you.
Also, it's not actually difficult to build these things. The slaves weren't even expensive either, since the regions involved in the trade were suffering from region-wide inflation and the associated economic meltdowns.
>Taking Haiti and giving justice to the rebels could have been done in one or two years. Building everything again on another island would have taken a full century. I really don't know which is iffier: Your sense of 'justice', or your conception of how long it takes to build plantations.
>It was sold to the revolted slaves for the same reason Louisiana was sold: we needed quick money>we needed quick money>weCut your tongue out and curse your mother. Your mother's mother was a harlot, and her mother was a heretic. Your Pope is the devil in pigskin, and you lack any conception of deity. When you go to war, you lose to unarmed slaves and unsupported tanks. All you've ever done was ambush people caught in infighting and use cheap extortion. France was a mistake, and it's a horrible blemish on European history.
And this, from the nation physically nearest to Spain and the UK. Light absolutely does cast shadows.
