>>16086872You forgot to mention lots of heroin and cocaine.
>>16086861He specifically mentioned at that time, he understands the symbology mentioned and has been thoroughly harassed and questioned about it, and he has his own reason, and that's about it. Take it or leave it. Many won't. It's suspicious because it's designed to be, before any of us were even born, including brand. Who truly knows. He found a space to talk shit and get paid, and hasn't been cut down yet. Whether that's because he's ultimately irrelevant, or he's hitting allowed (yet publically fringe) topics, we could all be so wrong that we're all allowed to talk. It's more likely that
Not that I feel it applies to brand, but realise that the ones who truly understand what they're doing will outright lie directly to your face, blatantly and maliciously lie and honey their sentences. I don't feel brand does this and he transverses much more relevant data than a generic news organisation, for instance, as that's the entire point of his discussions
If he's poking normies, let him be
If hes caught lying and playing the game, he has a good idea of public sentiment towards traitors
