>>16121326>still resorting to cheap ad hominemI don't blame you for your assumptions; they are your own. To base an entire point on those assumptions, however, is indicative of your lack of critical thinking - instead of talking about the point, you attempt to undermine the validity of my views with fallacious (and frankly absurd) reasoning.
Observational statements and commentary, as you so astutely put it, are still subject to critique. Mine would be that, despite all your words which ultimately say nothing, the immature emotional development shines through
