[468 / 26 / 59]
Quoted By: >>16169612 >>16169614 >>16169616 >>16169622 >>16169624 >>16169625 >>16169626 >>16169635 >>16169637 >>16169648 >>16169651 >>16169657 >>16169658 >>16169660 >>16169668 >>16169672 >>16169678 >>16169679 >>16169681 >>16169686 >>16169698 >>16169700 >>16169711 >>16169718 >>16169721 >>16169722 >>16169725 >>16169736 >>16169741 >>16169789 >>16169794 >>16169807 >>16169813 >>16169828 >>16169843 >>16170280
Demonstration and Evidence for God:
It is a PROVEN OBSERVABLE FACT that any product, i.e., a new cause out of a natural state requires a voluntary interruption, i.e, a choice maker.
Likewise, the universe, a product, i.e., a new cause out of the natural state of nothingness requires a voluntary interruption, i.e., a choice maker.
You can't have an involuntary interruption because then that will make the interruption absolute, a part of the natural state, which is not an interruption, but a natural state.
>So the natural state of nothingness is to create the universe
No, the natural state of nothingness is nothingness, nothing.
>The universe did come out of nothing
By fulfilling a requirement.
>It does not require an interruption.
Then there would still be nothing.
>Why can't something come out of nothing?
You tell me.
So as long as we know that only a choice can interrupt a natural state, the interruption on the state of nothingness to create the universe requires a bare minimum of a choice maker so far.
https://youtu.be/p7YNhvwBFEw?t=554 [Embed]
This is political Janitor Sir. You can't get more politically incorrect than saying God exist.
Christian: 1
Atheist: 0
It is a PROVEN OBSERVABLE FACT that any product, i.e., a new cause out of a natural state requires a voluntary interruption, i.e, a choice maker.
Likewise, the universe, a product, i.e., a new cause out of the natural state of nothingness requires a voluntary interruption, i.e., a choice maker.
You can't have an involuntary interruption because then that will make the interruption absolute, a part of the natural state, which is not an interruption, but a natural state.
>So the natural state of nothingness is to create the universe
No, the natural state of nothingness is nothingness, nothing.
>The universe did come out of nothing
By fulfilling a requirement.
>It does not require an interruption.
Then there would still be nothing.
>Why can't something come out of nothing?
You tell me.
So as long as we know that only a choice can interrupt a natural state, the interruption on the state of nothingness to create the universe requires a bare minimum of a choice maker so far.
https://youtu.be/p7YNhvwBFEw?t=554 [Embed]
This is political Janitor Sir. You can't get more politically incorrect than saying God exist.
Christian: 1
Atheist: 0
