>>16186942>Enjoying talking to me should not have anything to do with sexFor me, here on this hellish /qa/ refugee camp of a board? No, nothing to do with sex.
A man talking to socially in person, on social media, etc? Probably some underlying sexual interest there, if they are aware you are a woman.
But, for me, here's the kicker:
>should not haveShould or shouldn't are not in play here. Ony is or isn't. And the world I am trying to convey to you is the one that IS, regardless of what you or I WANT it to be.
>I'm not seeking validation.So what if you were? I've already said it's not a bad thing or a character flaw.
>I'm not seeking validation. >I take my appearance very serious so when someone insults me I get hurtPoint makes itself. No further remark needed.
