>>16194224>too hard to hideI think literally nobody would notice if they were to snatch some prisoners away from a third world prison, or anything like that. It's most likely already done, and, it's not as if you're going to know it if they're killing people and covering it up, right?
>UFCI suppose it's different because they're only going at each other with fisticuffs, within some boundaries still also. If you were a billionaire and you set up a gladiator stadium, you'd have the people you forced in there using guns, blades, anything to make for a show.
Anyway, I mentioned something relating to that in one of those textwalls, it's not that stuff similar to gladiator fights don't already exist in entertainment media, but, the advantage for rich people is that they can get past any of the limitations to both be more intimate with that experience, and have it be more intense. The kind of person that would watch a bloody UFC fight and freak out about it, would love it a million times more if they got to set their personal fights up that were way more violent and always ended in death. That door is opened for that rich, alongside the fact that they're so devoid of soul that they can't really enjoy anything except abusing their lack of risk in doing anything and degenerate things not open to the average person like fucking kids whenever they feel like it. I think watching and being somehow involved in a fight to the death would be absolutely rich people culture. Like you said, it's already a trillion dollar industry, that shows just how much people love it, why wouldn't larger-than-life rich individuals take it to the next level where they could have the same experience but a million times better?
But, maybe it is too hard to snatch people to use for that kind of purpose, like you said. Not very well versed in that kind thing here. Still, I'm sticking with that it'd actually be extremely easy to just take away some homeless nobodies, or prisoners. Char lim.
