>>16207299why do you decide that history begins then? serbia had every right to stop any secession attempts in kosovo, and no proof of genocide has been found.
and what you're referring to in bosnia is indeed fake and gay, the populace in republika srpska was given a choice to either stay or to leave to any desired location, transported by the army
much worse stuff has been done in yugoslavia, and generally not by serbs. croats had no justification for the genocide that took place in ww2, and why does everyone ignore what happened in srpska krajina?
if you want to understand why those geopolitical decisions happened you must consider first world war, serbian sacrifices, and whether the other republics in yugoslavia were on the winning or the losing side.
i'll just remind you that croatia is the only nation to be on the losing side of both world wars and escape consequence free due to the idea of south-slavic unity, and yugoslavia
what happened in kosovo is unfortunate as well, but if you look at the demographics of kosovo throughout time, you'll likely come to the conclusion that it was the fault of tito, who had imperialistic ambitions to integrate albania into yugoslavia as well. the issue of kosovo's demographics shouldve been dealt with much earlier
