>>16328072The problem you're running into with these anons is you are the exception to the rule.
If I said "Niggers are violent impulsive monkeys" that would be a stereotype. Or if I said "Gays are promiscuous hedonists that spread disease and are generally unpleasant and narcissistic drama queens" that would also be a stereotype.
Are these things true? Yes, for most people who fit the description they would be those things.
The problem with turning stereotypes into dogma about a group is that some people in that group do not fit the stereotype. That's why there is some merit to the claim that "stereotypes are harmful".
The problem is most people in the group do fit the stereotype.
The other problem is normalfaggot smooth-brains are incapable of thinking in more complex terms than "all thing good" or "all thing bad" so now "all stereotypes are bad".
Throw a pearl to swine and it turns to mud.
People tried to get normalfaggots to stop turning stereotypes into dogma, and since they're smoothbrained normalfaggots, they then turned "all stereotyping is bad" into dogma and now we have the same problem but in reverse.
Basically; stupid people ruin fucking everything. It doesn't matter how good your idea is. If they get ahold of it - they will ruin it.