/bant/ - International/Random » Thread #16364684

[94 / 11 / 23]

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 19:27:38 No.16364684 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>16364692 >>16364730 >>16364744 >>16364845 >>16364875 >>16364944 >>16365466 >>16365561 >>16365583 >>16365656

>no you don't get it!
>I called you gay!
>gay is an insult, it's funny!
>you're supposed to be offended!
>you CAN'T agree with me and be happy about it!
>it's not ALLOWED!
>you HAVE to get defensive and try to convince me you like girls!
>you're not supposed to admit it! that's wrong!
>you're wrong!
>you're supposed to want to be straight and feel bad that you aren't!
>it's not fair!!!!

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:pa9Gbl8k Sun 23 Oct 2022 19:29:11 No.16364692 Report

Quoted By: >>16364698 >>16364879

>>16364684
fag

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1643475386227.png, 50KiB, 199x253

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 19:30:48 No.16364698 Report

Quoted By: >>16364730

>>16364692
>w--what if i use the slur instead!
>fag!
>faggy!
>faggot!
>faaaaaaag!
>GET MAD AT ME ALREADY!!
>YOU HAVE TO HATE BEING GAY, YOU CAN'T LOVE BEING GAY, IT'S NOT ALLOWED!!!
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 042.gif, 1MiB, 372x298

Anonymous ID:pa9Gbl8k Sun 23 Oct 2022 19:33:31 No.16364706 Report

Quoted By: >>16364709 >>16365649

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 19:33:57 No.16364709 Report

Quoted By:

>>16364706
based

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 19:35:35 No.16364715 Report

Quoted By: >>16364719

If you unironically get aroused imagining your penis in another grown man's poop hole then you have a mental illness.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 19:37:01 No.16364719 Report

Quoted By: >>16364740

>>16364715
>implying it's not a mental illness if the man isn't grown
If you think that would make it better you're the mentally ill one here

adolf hitler

adolf hitler ID:03QqSxet Sun 23 Oct 2022 19:40:48 No.16364730 Report

Quoted By: >>16364738

>>16364684
>>16364698
nobody says any of this, but have a (You) out of pity

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1637472801353.png, 63KiB, 225x224

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 19:42:39 No.16364738 Report

Quoted By:

>>16364730
>NOOOOOOO you CAN'T just paraphrase my secret inner thoughts because you just CAN'T OK, YOU'RE WRONG, YOU'RE WRONG, YOU'RE WROOOOOONG I DON'T LOOK LIKE THIS AND I DON'T SAY THIS NOOOOOOOO

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 19:42:55 No.16364740 Report

Quoted By: >>16364747

>>16364719
I would say pederasty isn't as depraved because prepubescent boys are still neotenous and kind of like girls at that stage. Both are extremely bad but attraction to grown men moreso.
Obviously if you're a low IQ commoner you'll get triggered hearing that but it's pretty obviously true if you actually think about it.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:QFSkZCaz Sun 23 Oct 2022 19:44:49 No.16364744 Report

Quoted By: >>16365165

>>16364684
troon is the new flavor of the decade insult though

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 19:45:26 No.16364747 Report

Quoted By: >>16364786

>>16364740
>implying susceptibility to consequent psychological trauma is a secondary consideration and the chief determinant of sexual morality is resemblance to girls
most depraved thing i've heard today thanks

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:ik4HOYbi Sun 23 Oct 2022 19:46:51 No.16364756 Report

Quoted By: >>16364766

The insult works better if youre actually gay

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 19:49:01 No.16364766 Report

Quoted By:

>>16364756
Sure, if your aim is to confuse me and make me mock you
The only thing offensive about it is the insult to our intelligence as a species represented in your thinking it's offensive

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 19:51:57 No.16364786 Report

Quoted By: >>16364793

>>16364747
I'm saying in terms of how natural it is, you fucking midwit moralfag. The historical precedent backs me up on this.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 19:53:11 No.16364793 Report

Quoted By: >>16364819

>>16364786
Except nature doesn't matter and morals do

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 19:58:36 No.16364819 Report

Quoted By: >>16364844 >>16364866

>>16364793
Morality is nature, you retard christcuck. Sorry you got molested and are now a repressed homosexual. I didn't.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 20:06:02 No.16364844 Report

Quoted By: >>16364912

>>16364819
>Morality is nature,
Wrong.
Nothing else you said applies to me so I'm ignoring all of it.
But nature in a broad sense is not a part of morality.
*Some* parts of nature are parts of morality. Specifically, some parts of *human* nature. More specifically, conscience.
Men being attracted to women is certainly part of the consensus human nature. But it's not part of the consensus conscience, because sexual arousal is not conscience.
It is, separately, part of *some* people's consciences. Mostly christcucks and naturecucks. But the consensus conscience finds nothing morally necessary about it, and therefore, in spite of what (You) may think, it objectively *is* not morally necessary.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:QFVjH4WE Sun 23 Oct 2022 20:06:03 No.16364845 Report

Quoted By:

>>16364684
this

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:tg1q8+Kq Sun 23 Oct 2022 20:09:52 No.16364866 Report

Quoted By: >>16364912

>>16364819
>morality is nature
>calls others christcucks
Yeah that's what we like to call the "take your meds moment"

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:ezkMP5Gr Sun 23 Oct 2022 20:13:38 No.16364875 Report

Quoted By: >>16364880

>>16364684
a fag kek

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:csdIbb2f Sun 23 Oct 2022 20:14:13 No.16364879 Report

Quoted By: >>16365081

>>16364692
that just turns me on

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 20:14:31 No.16364880 Report

Quoted By:

>>16364875
u--uwu

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 20:21:22 No.16364912 Report

Quoted By: >>16364920

>>16364866
>>16364844
Ethics are post-moralization of what "works," in the sense of being conducive to progress. Progress is human dharma, whether that be large scale (civilizational conquest, scientific progress, space exploration) or primitive/low level (hunt, provide for family, breed). There is no distinction between something supposedly "devised" or "artificial" and something "natural," because they're one and the same.
>sexual arousal is not conscience
It is. The right thing to do is that which is in service of the objective. Furthering one's own blood line is seen as being in service of the objective, therefore it is the right thing to do and feels as such.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 20:24:29 No.16364920 Report

Quoted By: >>16364946

>>16364912
That's utilitarianism. I disagree with utilitarianism in favor of a psychological-deontological system. When I say sexual arousal is not conscience, I mean psychologically. They aren't the same mental phenomenon. Which is important because, in my opinion, what's moral has no direct relation to "what 'works'," and is instead a matter of what the typical person's conscience tells them.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:YWPbe+hi Sun 23 Oct 2022 20:29:54 No.16364944 Report

Quoted By:

>>16364684
Being "straight" doesn't exist
Everyone is bisexual to some degree

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 20:30:23 No.16364946 Report

Quoted By: >>16364964

>>16364920
Morality is heuristically manifested over generations by a similar mechanism to how AI converges on various ideas. It is "what works" by definition, because it out-competed other potential moral systems. That's also why you find similar traditional morality across cultures that had no contact with each other.
You're also mistaken in divorcing the "psychological" and instinctual levels of consciousness, because there is no real distinction. To illustrate, I was watching a video on a woman who couldn't feel fear because she had her amygdala removed. She recounted walking through an empty parking lot on her way home from work, and being mugged. Can you guess what she did after that? You would think she logically decided to stop going that direction. But because she felt no fear or negative emotional reaction when she got mugged, she just kept taking that same route back home from work.
You can call it utilitarianism but I really think it's equally mystical/spiritual, because the objective is something capable of being seen in one's mind's eye, but not ever adequately expressed or described. A faith of sorts.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1595089101215.jpg, 93KiB, 846x1100

Anonymous ID:C1EUOjMx Sun 23 Oct 2022 20:31:36 No.16364951 Report

Quoted By: >>16364955

>liking anything other than brown girls
cringe

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 20:32:17 No.16364955 Report

Quoted By:

>>16364951
>blue eyed shitskin
phenotype check
even for a fictional character my mind objects

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 20:34:55 No.16364964 Report

Quoted By: >>16365004

>>16364946
>Morality is heuristically manifested over generations by a similar mechanism to how AI converges on various ideas. It is "what works" by definition,
And yet, if it were that simple, the consensus conscience would find homosexuality unacceptable, and it doesn't.
>You're also mistaken in divorcing the "psychological" and instinctual levels of consciousness
Conscience, not consciousness. I understand people often confuse these words, but I'm not confusing them. When I say conscience, I mean conscience. And there is a distinction. Not between psychological and instinctual -- indeed, these are the same -- but between different parts of the psyche. Conscience is conscience. Arousal is arousal. Your conscience is not your arousal any more than your memories are your breath control. I believe, of all aspects of human nature, it is conscience, specifically, and only conscience, which bears the authority to define what's morally right, because it's only in conscience, and no other part of the psyche, that we experience moralistic feelings.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 20:44:40 No.16365004 Report

Quoted By: >>16365027 >>16365030

>>16364964
>And yet, if it were that simple, the consensus conscience would find homosexuality unacceptable, and it doesn't.
Due to decades of jewish propaganda encouraging people to leave their traditions. That concedes the whole point.
>Conscience is conscience. Arousal is arousal.
Your conscience emerges from the same wellspring that does your arousal, they're the same. Trying to compartmentalize your consciousness (yes, consciousness) only leads to the waters getting muddied. The only correct way to view your mind is a pool of abstract, unknowable spiritual energy. The reason I can tell you with confidence that there is no difference between conscience and arousal is that there's no utility in doing so, and things are only real insofar as they serve a purpose (which is kind of inspiring when you think about it).
If conscience bears the authority to define what's right, then you'll have to explain white guilt, for one thing. Spoiler, "conscience" is not the end-all of decision-making unless you define your entire psyche as your conscience at which point it loses its definition.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 20:50:50 No.16365027 Report

Quoted By: >>16365071

>>16365004
>Due to decades of jewish propaganda encouraging people to leave their traditions
No, I believe it's naturally this way. I believe if someone grew up in an isolated bubble with no culture, and knew only by instinct that people mate, they would not feel distaste for homosexuality in their conscience. They would feel it, but not in their conscience.
>Your conscience emerges from the same wellspring that does your arousal,
Yes.
>they're the same.
No.
>Trying to compartmentalize
You don't have to try. You can feel the difference. On the contrary, it takes effort *not* to compartmentalize. Different parts of the brain are at different locations and have different structures and functions. Just because the brain is a contiguous organ does not mean it's a featureless sphere. It's wrinkly and folded. To feel pain in your elbow and tell yourself your foot hurts is not some enlightened metaphysical observation, but simply unnatural and counterfactual. So too it is with conscience and arousal.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 20:52:36 No.16365030 Report

Quoted By: >>16365071

>>16365004
>If conscience bears the authority to define what's right, then you'll have to explain white guilt, for one thing.
Whataboutism discarded
>Spoiler, "conscience" is not the end-all of decision-making
No, but it's the end-all of morality.
Spoiler, morality is not the end-all of decision-making.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:05:43 No.16365071 Report

Quoted By: >>16365086 >>16365088

>>16365027
>they would not feel distaste for homosexuality in their conscience. They would feel it, but not in their conscience.
How do you not see how ridiculous it is trying to compartmentalize what is conscience versus not conscience? It doesn't matter whether you consider it conscience or not, they feel it nonetheless. Conscience is a general term that doesn't hold any water in a rigorous context for reasons I already described.
>You don't have to try. You can feel the difference.
I could equally describe my distaste at homosexuals as visceral disgust or righteous desire to rid the world of spiritual corruption for the sake of all that is good in the world. It's the same feeling, but the latter you would call conscience and the former not. I would call it both.
>Different parts of the brain are at different locations and have different structures and functions. Just because the brain is a contiguous organ does not mean it's a featureless sphere. It's wrinkly and folded. To feel pain in your elbow and tell yourself your foot hurts is not some enlightened metaphysical observation, but simply unnatural and counterfactual. So too it is with conscience and arousal.
That's not an argument for conscience and arousal being functionally distinct. Yes, the texture of the feelings are different, yes, different brain regions are responsible for them, but they are the same in essence due to their interdependence. I could claim to associate certain mental functions with my gut microbiota and individually taxonomize that function based on that rationale, but it doesn't serve any purpose -- nay, it's counterproductive and a self-sabotaging midwitted way to self-conceptualize.
>>16365030
>Whataboutism
...is the biggest midwit cope I've ever heard in my life. It's 100% fair to ask "what about X," if your system is so supposedly robust. You discard it because it destroys your whole argument.
>morality is not the end-all
Christcucks may follow morals out of fear, not compulsion

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:UJVhdQil Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:08:38 No.16365078 Report

Quoted By: >>16365082

ya'll talkin like fags

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:+BZbXSwJ Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:08:54 No.16365081 Report

Quoted By:

>>16364879
You're a filthy little whore and you love it

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:+BZbXSwJ Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:09:30 No.16365082 Report

Quoted By:

>>16365078
Bait

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:+BZbXSwJ Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:10:29 No.16365086 Report

Quoted By:

>>16365071
>visceral disgust or righteous desire to rid the world of spiritual corruption
Me when I think about Americans

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:11:17 No.16365088 Report

Quoted By: >>16365118

>>16365071
>How do you not see how ridiculous it is trying to compartmentalize what is conscience versus not conscience?
It's more ridiculous not to compartmentalize. They feel different, therefore they are different. Simple as. Compare that to the mental gymnastics and spiritual mumbo jumbo you have to go through to justify why they're supposedly the same.
>I could equally describe my distaste at homosexuals as visceral disgust or righteous desire to rid the world of spiritual corruption for the sake of all that is good in the world. It's the same feeling,
No it's not, those two things feel completely different. Those are both feelings I've experienced, and one feels like disgust, whereas the other feels like righteous indignation. It's a qualitatively different experience.
>Yes, the texture of the feelings are different, yes, different brain regions are responsible for them, but they are the same
Imagine contradicting yourself in the span of one sentence. Couldn't be me
>You discard it because it destroys your whole argument.
I discard it because it's irrelevant. No one said anything about white guilt, and it doesn't even exist.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:YWPbe+hi Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:12:49 No.16365090 Report

Quoted By: >>16365098

>two autists arguing
cringe everytime

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1665968522027.png, 1MiB, 1910x918

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:14:59 No.16365098 Report

Quoted By:

>>16365090

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:19:43 No.16365118 Report

Quoted By: >>16365154

>>16365088
>They feel different, therefore they are different.
Making distinctions has to serve a purpose. We call white people white and black people black because we understand effectively what we mean when we say that, and for us to make tons of technical classifications about ethnic admixture would pose a hindrance to communication. The same goes for attempting to compartmentalize mental functions. I ask you time and again what the purpose of this is -- in other words, what the tangible, real-world benefit of making these distinctions is, and you ever fail to provide an answer.
>No it's not, those two things feel completely different
Oh yeah, two feelings that happen to perfectly accompany one another to the point where I can't tell where one ends and the other begins. Sounds distinct to me!
>Imagine contradicting yourself in the span of one sentence
There is no contradiction for the same reason I described in the first paragraph here. Distinctions are only real insofar as they have an effect. It's like trying to argue in favor of determinism or free will -- what's the point? There isn't one. Such is the argument for compatibilism.
>No one said anything about white guilt, and it doesn't even exist.
I did, and it certainly does exist regardless of whether you or I experience it. What's next, guilt is not an aspect of conscience?

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:26:07 No.16365154 Report

Quoted By: >>16365223 >>16365238

>>16365118
>Making distinctions has to serve a purpose.
I don't agree. If we observe two things as distinct, it's easiest and most natural to make a distinction between them, so we do. I don't see why we should force ourselves not to just because "muh purpose."
>two feelings that happen to perfectly accompany one another to the point where I can't tell where one ends and the other begins
Sounds like a (You) problem.
Maybe this is why cuckservative rightards are the way they are. A mental illness that causes them to confuse disgust with outrage
>it certainly does exist
I disagree. Guilt is of course an aspect of conscience, but "white guilt" doesn't exist.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:fMRoxh3Z Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:28:13 No.16365165 Report

Quoted By: >>16365416

>>16364744
never seen it in a mainstream media headline

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:F5XhjO81 Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:30:52 No.16365183 Report

Quoted By: >>16365188

gays are just another disgusting fetish. on par with scat.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:32:31 No.16365188 Report

Quoted By:

>>16365183
There's a hormonal factor so that's unlikely

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:qI7tb/Bd Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:32:53 No.16365192 Report

Quoted By:

Gay is dirty monkeypox

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:40:27 No.16365223 Report

Quoted By: >>16365231 >>16365238 >>16365270

>>16365154
>I don't agree. If we observe two things as distinct, it's easiest and most natural to make a distinction between them, so we do. I don't see why we should force ourselves not to just because "muh purpose."
This is where the autistic midwit begins to falter. If you go down this path of constantly trying to classify everything with perpetually increasing specificity then you will get caught up in analysis paralysis, which is immoral because it's wasted time which you could have spent doing something meaningful.
>Sounds like a (You) problem.
>disgust at homosexuals is a problem
Repressor detected
>confuse disgust with outrage
Give me a real-world scenario (the bane of every one of your arguments) where you would feel one but not the other. Since you're such a fan of science I'm sure you'd be interested to know that healthy volunteers seeing maggots triggered the same physiological stress response that did seeing homosexuals kissing.
It's also worth noting that commoners aren't really capable of feeling righteous indignation the way upper castes are, yet it has the same ultimate effect, which is correction/avoidance of the provocation. This isn't even worth going into if you don't think distinctions have to serve a purpose, though. If it serves no purpose, then all of this is immaterial.
Think about that. You're debating me and trying to convince me of something that doesn't serve a purpose. How retarded is that? On the other hand, I'm trying to convince you to drop the false distinctions, which would have a positive impact on your life by freeing you from analysis paralysis.
>I disagree. Guilt is of course an aspect of conscience, but "white guilt" doesn't exist.
Forget white guilt specifically and consider that people's consciousness is largely determined by how they're raised. You could accidentally eat pork as a muslim and feel guilty, so does that mean eating pork is objectively wrong?

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:41:41 No.16365231 Report

Quoted By:

>>16365223
>consciousness
conscience*

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:44:16 No.16365238 Report

Quoted By: >>16365274

>>16365154
>>16365223
Here's another example, better than the musliim one. Anglos are highly altruistic and their conscience compels them to be nice to jews and treat them as fellow humans. Jews are extremely adept at appealing to the white conscience. So would you call that correct behavior?

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:51:25 No.16365270 Report

Quoted By: >>16365301 >>16365310

>>16365223
>constantly trying to classify everything
>trying
I classify it because I don't have to try. I would have to try not to. I feel the difference, therefore the difference exists. If I had to try to classify it, I wouldn't classify it.
>Repressor detected
I don't bother repressing. Why would I? After all, homosexuality isn't wrong, only disgusting. To heterosexuals, that is -- and therefore objectively, since heterosexuals are the majority. I empathize with their disgust because that's how I feel about heterosexuality.
>Give me a real-world scenario (the bane of every one of your arguments) where you would feel one but not the other
You already just gave me two:
* homosexuality
* maggots
Both things that normal people find disgusting but not immoral.
>It's also worth noting that commoners aren't really capable of feeling righteous indignation
Fattest crock of shit I've ever heard. The average person feels righteous indignation witnessing a murder.
>On the other hand, I'm trying to convince you to drop the false distinctions
If I can empirically experience the distinction then by definition it can't be false. As it happens, this empirical experience is my sole reason for drawing the distinction.
>You could accidentally eat pork as a muslim and feel guilty, so does that mean eating pork is objectively wrong?
This is why I appeal to the *consensus* conscience. Obviously upbringing can alter a person's conscience. Such alterations are untrustworthy, but since it's impossible to be free of them, the closest we can come is to bear witness to everyone's feelings and subtract their differences.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:52:16 No.16365274 Report

Quoted By:

>>16365238
>Anglos are highly altruistic and their conscience compels them to be nice to jews and treat them as fellow humans. Jews are extremely adept at appealing to the white conscience. So would you call that correct behavior?
It's unclear which of these two behaviors you're asking about. Never mind that I disagree with both assessments anyway.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:qI7tb/Bd Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:56:04 No.16365301 Report

Quoted By: >>16365309

>>16365270
>but not immoral
How did the dogs of homosexuals get monkeypox?
How did the kids of homosexuals get monkeypox?

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:56:44 No.16365309 Report

Quoted By: >>16365319

>>16365301
I said normal people, not conspiracy wackos on 4chan

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:57:04 No.16365310 Report

Quoted By: >>16365324

>>16365270
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA WTF
>Nothing else you said applies to me so I'm ignoring all of it.
>Nothing else you said applies to me so I'm ignoring all of it.
>Nothing else you said applies to me so I'm ignoring all of it.
>Nothing else you said applies to me so I'm ignoring all of it.
>Nothing else you said applies to me so I'm ignoring all of it.
SO YOU ARE FUCKING HOMOSEXUAL YOU SICKO. I CALLED IT RIGHT FROM THE BEGINNING! YOU'RE FLAMING!

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:qI7tb/Bd Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:58:10 No.16365319 Report

Quoted By: >>16365328

>>16365309
The CIA gave the kids and dogs of homosexuals monkeypox? Dastardly.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:58:54 No.16365324 Report

Quoted By: >>16365354

>>16365310
Yes, I felt it should be obvious I wasn't denying that part, considering I pretty much state it outright in the OP. I was denying everything *else* you said about me.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 21:59:23 No.16365328 Report

Quoted By: >>16365337

>>16365319
>the conversation is somehow now related to the CIA
I said normal people, not schizos

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:qI7tb/Bd Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:00:32 No.16365337 Report

Quoted By: >>16365344

>>16365328
So it was Jews who gave the kids and dogs of homosexuals monkeypox? What was their motive?

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:01:15 No.16365344 Report

Quoted By: >>16365356

>>16365337
>So it was my ass that I pulled out the next culprit from? What was its motive?

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:02:09 No.16365354 Report

Quoted By: >>16365367

>>16365324
It makes complete sense to me now why you would think your own conscience is objectively right. It's a cope. I can lay it out for you right here to get you to stop coping:
>If you're a good person, you will work create a brighter future.
>A bright future needs good people.
>You believe you're a good person.
>Personality traits are almost completely genetically determined.
>You need to pass on your genes to create what you think would be a bright future with good people.
>You need to impregnate a woman to pass on your genes.
>Your proclivity is not in accordance with what is right.
>You are defective.
>You are defective.
>You are defective.
>You are defective.
>You are defective.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:qI7tb/Bd Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:02:16 No.16365356 Report

Quoted By: >>16365454

>>16365344
I get it now. Putin gave the kids and dogs of homosexuals monkeypox, then blamed Ukraine for it.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:03:38 No.16365367 Report

Quoted By: >>16365399

>>16365354
>>If you're a good person, you will work create a brighter future.
>>A bright future needs good people.
>>You believe you're a good person.
These three are true, the fourth one is bs, the rest are valid but unsound conclusions from a false premise

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:07:57 No.16365399 Report

Quoted By: >>16365413

>>16365367
Next you're going to tell me you were telling the truth about not being molested.
https://sci-hub.wf/10.1126/science.aat7693
>Trait homosexuality: 67% environmentally determined under modern circumstances
>the fourth one is bs
Yes identical twins getting separated at birth and having eerily similar tastes and tendencies is all coincidental. Nothing to see here, goy!
>valid but unsound conclusions from a false premise
The false premise that a good person will work to create a brighter future? Tell me EXACTLY what the false premise is.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:10:21 No.16365413 Report

Quoted By: >>16365423

>>16365399
>Next you're going to tell me you were telling the truth about not being molested.
Yeah
>Yes muh anecdote is a coincidence
Yes, as anecdotes tend to be
>Tell me EXACTLY what the false premise is.
That personality traits are almost completely genetically determined

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1666538604536720.jpg, 159KiB, 976x850

Anonymous ID:QFSkZCaz Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:10:42 No.16365416 Report

Quoted By:

>>16365165
You're right, troon is only used in altright chudcel spaces while calling people fags and things gay was popular among everyone

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:11:42 No.16365423 Report

Quoted By: >>16365438

>>16365413
How deep does this rabbit hole of cope go? Do you even believe in race and IQ? Do you believe a Bantu could be the next Mozart if he were raised correctly?

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:14:16 No.16365438 Report

Quoted By: >>16365457

>>16365423
>Do you even believe in race
It's a real and verified independent predictor, but a weaker predictor than individual differences, so it basically doesn't matter
>and IQ?
It's a stronger predictor, but it's still not everything
>Do you believe a Bantu could be the next Mozart if he were raised correctly?
Yeah

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:+BZbXSwJ Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:17:08 No.16365454 Report

Quoted By: >>16365538

>>16365356
Russia doesn't have a single recorded case of monkeypox

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:18:02 No.16365457 Report

Quoted By: >>16365480

>>16365438
>weaker predictor than individual differences
Far from it. 80% by mid adulthood. Don't listen to me, check the wikipedia article!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ
Here's a deep dive on the data from someone like you, a former homosexual, who was high IQ enough to drop it. https://www.bitchute.com/video/w3y2SDpIEhE/
>>Do you believe a Bantu could be the next Mozart if he were raised correctly?
>Yeah
Bantu average 68 IQ (functionally retarded) yet one of them may become the next Mozart. Bravo, great analysis. Your opinion definitely matters.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:eJFQFX4h Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:19:01 No.16365460 Report

Quoted By:

if this board didnt have IDs you'd assume this thread was imptrash

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 16d69287cd413563a0b3788263dc39d7.jpg, 269KiB, 1000x1415

Anonymous ID:wm4SVlIF Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:19:47 No.16365466 Report

Quoted By:

>>16364684

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:21:59 No.16365480 Report

Quoted By: >>16365502

>>16365457
>Don't listen to me, check the wikipedia article!
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ
We're talking about personality traits, not IQ
Also that's single-generation heritability. Multigenerational heritability should be single-generational heritability to the power of the number of generations. 80% is already less than half by 4 generations in. How many generations do you think any given race has existed for

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:26:00 No.16365502 Report

Quoted By: >>16365515

>>16365480
>Multigenerational heritability should be single-generational heritability to the power of the number of generations
Retard, your genetics don't change no matter what your environmental conditions. This has already been examined with hispanics in the US whose IQs don't improve after being here for four generations (source: We Wanted Workers).
Watch the bitchute video and almost all of your concerns will be addressed. Use inductive logic and you'll realize why your lack of desire to impregnate a female is not just a benign matter of taste, but immoral.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 5er2zdwjojx61.png, 183KiB, 800x811

Anonymous ID:Ybn0Dc5W Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:27:15 No.16365507 Report

Quoted By:

>bitchute video

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:28:40 No.16365515 Report

Quoted By: >>16365532

>>16365502
>Retard, your genetics don't change
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutation
>no matter what your environmental conditions
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetics
Also, from the article you linked in the first place:
>Although IQ differences between individuals have been shown to have a large hereditary component, it does not follow that disparities in IQ between groups have a genetic basis.[11][12][13][14] The scientific consensus is that genetics does not explain average differences in IQ test performance between racial groups.[15][16][17][18][19][20]

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:31:56 No.16365532 Report

Quoted By: >>16365541 >>16365543

>>16365515
>>Although IQ differences between individuals have been shown to have a large hereditary component, it does not follow that disparities in IQ between groups have a genetic basis.[11][12][13][14] The scientific consensus is that genetics does not explain average differences in IQ test performance between racial groups.[15][16][17][18][19][20]
They have to say that. My point was to show you that even a pozzed source acknowledges 80% heritability, and ethnic groups are genetic. Do the math.
Literally watch the video, it will address every concern you have.
I'm assuming you're trolling when you link the genetic mutation article? But then again, you actually just suggested that IQ gains can compound intergenerationally via environmental exposures, so you're already living in candyland. No one would take what you're saying seriously for a second in any rigorous setting, take it from me. They would look at each other and ask "why is this person telling me random genetic mutations can cause marked IQ gains across a few generations?"

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:qI7tb/Bd Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:33:38 No.16365538 Report

Quoted By:

>>16365454
That's because Putin didn't do it to his own people, he gave it to the kids and dogs of homosexuals in the west.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:34:06 No.16365541 Report

Quoted By: >>16365554

>>16365532
>They have to say that.
[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]
>My point was to show you that even a pozzed source acknowledges 80% heritability, and ethnic groups are genetic. Do the math.
I already did the math, 80%^4 < 50%
>Literally watch the video,
(You)
>But then again, you actually just suggested that IQ gains can compound intergenerationally via environmental exposures,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetics

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Ybn0Dc5W Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:34:19 No.16365543 Report

Quoted By: >>16365554

>>16365532
>They have to say that
Embarrassing cope
You lost

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:37:18 No.16365554 Report

Quoted By: >>16365555 >>16365560

>>16365541
>>16365543
Yes, jewish academia would definitely allow papers saying there are racial disparities in IQ, You people are fucking imbeciles.
James Watson, the guy who discovered DNA, was excommunicated from the scientific community for making a passing comment about blacks having lower IQ than whites. That's how verboten it is. I don't know if I'm talking to redditfaggots for you not to know this or what.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:38:12 No.16365555 Report

Quoted By: >>16365558

>>16365554
>Yes, jewish academia woul
Well, that's assuming you buy into bullshit about how jews control everything in the first place lmao

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:38:53 No.16365558 Report

Quoted By: >>16365570

>>16365555
They won WWII, isn't that kind of the default assumption? Who else would control the world?

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Ybn0Dc5W Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:39:06 No.16365560 Report

Quoted By:

>>16365554
>DA JEEEEEEEWS
poltards last cope
you lost

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:+Effy3C4 Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:39:32 No.16365561 Report

Quoted By:

>>16364684
Who are you quoting faggot? Do you think feelings get hurt being called names on the internet?
lol
lmao even

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:40:50 No.16365570 Report

Quoted By: >>16365580 >>16365591

>>16365558
>They won WWII
Imagine being so vicariously salty on behalf of the nazis you think just because they lost means jews won
>Who else
Corporations mostly
>But that means le jewz
Literally doesn't, I know because I'm a jew and I'm not part of a corporation and I don't control shit

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:43:02 No.16365580 Report

Quoted By: >>16365594

>>16365570
>CIA USA
>Rothschild England
>Bolshevik Russia
WWII was literally whites controlling whites versus jews controlling whites. It's always mind-bending for me to talk to people on *chans that don't get this yet, but I guess if you're unironically homosexual anything is possible.
>Corporations mostly
Corporations that all decide to promote LGBT and BLM for... profit, or something. Burgers?
WAIT WAIT WAIT
>I know because I'm a jew
>I know because I'm a jew

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:nr7R7qOn Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:43:40 No.16365583 Report

Quoted By:

>>16364684
No no, it’s not insulting. It’s funny. Here’s the thing. Being gay is funny. Having a dick in an asshole? That’s funny. In the vagina? That’s for procreating and is what human beings were designed for. But in the butt? That’s for poopy. It’s funny. Gargling on a cock and balls? It’s funny. Like a clown. Missionary style sex? Not funny. Do you get it? No one is offended or crying unless you’re a bitch.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1622349773950.gif, 509KiB, 479x497

Anonymous ID:Byox0duq Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:46:18 No.16365591 Report

Quoted By: >>16365624

OP IS JEWISH
PACK IT UP BOYS
THREAD COMPLETED
>>16365570
I take back everything I said, embrace your homosexuality and do not reproduce.
Just don't molest any white children. Good day.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:46:46 No.16365594 Report

Quoted By:

>>16365580
>WWII was literally whites controlling whites versus jews controlling whites
>le conspiracy is true because le conspiracy
lel ok
>Corporations that all decide to promote LGBT and BLM for... profit, or something. Burgers?
Yes, exactly this. Society making progress toward egalitarianism of its own accord has acutely given people a temporary positive opinion on demographics who benefit from that progress, so corporations are cashing in by pretending they also give a shit

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1662354390660.gif, 544KiB, 871x517

Anonymous ID:Ybn0Dc5W Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:50:28 No.16365609 Report

Quoted By:

>be /pol/cel
>lose in everything
>*ACK*
lol

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:d9S0Oj6j Sun 23 Oct 2022 22:54:38 No.16365624 Report

Quoted By:

>>16365591
>Just don't molest any white children
Always baffles me how rightards manage to have all the pedophiles and accuse the left of having all the pedophiles at the same time. Takes some serious cognitive dissonance. Pastors. Cunnyposting. And who was it who was advocating pederasty as being superior to homosexuality earlier in this very thread

!Chuddy7gHA

!Chuddy7gHA ID:CSNB5QMf Sun 23 Oct 2022 23:04:47 No.16365649 Report

Quoted By:

>>16364706
gem

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:XK8NUVcV Sun 23 Oct 2022 23:06:47 No.16365656 Report

Quoted By:

>>16364684
you sound like you want to proof something fag

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches