>>169893You misunderstand me, I'm not an ancap, I'm more of a classical liberal because even ancaps make ancoms like you seem like the rational ones. If anything Central Africa is a case study on why a decently sized state to control it must exist.
Africa used to be unironically nice before communists and islamists took over post decolonization, take Rhodesia for example. Used to be one of the nicest areas in africa under capitalist colonial rule, but then communism came and ran that area into the ground in the Bush War.
Also, you say the warlords are the bourgoise class when they are actually closer to Landlords, using your terms. There is no bourgoise as there is no middle class in the uncivilized parts of africa where most of your data is from.
So in reality, the closest economic system currently is feudalism, where the landlords/warlords control their territory and rule over serfs/tribal folk. When we try to aid them they get greedy because there is no one punishing them when they exercise their power.
Now the solution to this is not to create a stateless society, communist or capitalist. The final solution to the africa problem is to install a strong, benevolent, almost fascist dictator who will use military to supress harmful ideologies and then bow out and install a freer government. They need a Pinochet.
And I agree, colonialism fucked up africa because it destroyed their identity and their established cultures. We really should have left them the fuck alone but hindsight is 20/20 so we must either fix it or leave them be.
As for classes in america, you are right, it is difficult to switch classes, but still entirely possible especially due to our large social safety net.
Also for that last point you are trying to say I'm using the no true scotsman fallacy, so I retorted with a picture of Stalin, who used communism to justify the death of tens of millions of Soviets through famine to which most ancoms use the no true scotsman fallacy as a defence.
