>>16405567*Dusts my pasta
Demonstration and Evidence of God:
It is a PROVEN OBSERVABLE FACT that any product, i.e., a new cause out of a natural state requires a voluntary interruption, i.e, a choice maker, a mind.
Likewise, the universe, a product, i.e., a new cause out of the natural state of nothingness requires a voluntary interruption, i.e., a choice maker, a mind.
You can't have an involuntary interruption because then that will make the interruption absolute, a part of the natural state, which is not an interruption, but a natural state.
>So the natural state of nothingness is to create the universeNo, the natural state of nothingness is nothingness, nothing.
>The universe did come out of nothingBy fulfilling a requirement.
>It does not require an interruption.Then there would still be nothing.
So as long as we know that only a choice can interrupt a natural state, the interruption on the state of nothingness to create the universe requires a bare minimum of a choice maker so far.
If they will accept rational evidence that is, backed by evidence of course.
So at the end of the day, it's a logical argument with evidence against a logical argument (if you could call it that) without evidence.
