>>16673583It's perpetual throughout its history on a micro-scale. How do you think it spread? Give an unhappy peasant a promise of a virgin bride, and imbue him with righteousness by saying "God wills it," and there you have a rebellion, violent or otherwise. The spread of christianity is this simple. Notice how christian zealots are never high caste. Nobility have always tolerated it as an aspect of European culture, but when it comes down to it, they will always bend towards a more holistic spirituality and put it in christian terms as an accommodation.
Everyone knows christianity won out over paganism, and the reason is because it's easy for peasant castes to understand: "Follow these rules and God will promise you an eternal reward." Christian morality does "work," but it's crude, suboptimal, and obsolete, especially since the advent of the internet. It forbids mere examination of morality since that would open up the possibility of some laws needing modification, which is an insult towards God. Overall, it favors stable stagnation and precludes any achievement of true excellence (including genetic), or any chance of our reaching the singularity.
>b-b-but I want to debate you on history!Der ewige midwit. All you need is implicit understanding, though ironically that itself is an understanding inherited through blood, not rote knowledge.
>>16673650Why do I feel nothing when you call me a retard, but it stings so much when I call you ugly IRL?
