>>16681179>you realize the David Reimer / John Money case is counterevidence to the /pol/tard narrative, right?I don't agree with the poltards narrative. I don't think trannies are a "Jooish psyop"
>John Money was attempting to disprove the existence of transgenderismOh? I would love to see your sources that proves this. Money, was in favor of the idea that gender was a societal construct. Many biographers and Intersex Society of North America believe that the Money's theories on gender fluidly helps thousands get sex reassignment surgeries. Terry Goldie, a biographer who wrote, The Man Who Invented Gender: Engaging the Ideas of John Money, was interviewed on The Sunday Edition. He says the following, "Money's position on the trans person was, I think, brilliant," Goldie says. "He believed that if you were a biological male and believed yourself to be a female that it was an idée fixe — it was so important to you as a person that it could not be contradicted. Goldie says that Money didn't search for biological evidence of transgender identity, but accepted a patient's conviction as fact." There is a reason why he is considered, "The father of gender theory" after all. Saying he trying disprove transgenderism is complete bullshit. Even if his goal was to disprove it, he reach the conclusion that it's valid.
>John Money is reviled as an archvillain by trans activistsThey hate him, but agree with his theories.
I bring up that case specifically to point out hypocrisy of trans activist who support the idea of transkids. How is the John money case any different from cases such as Noelle McMaher? Both cases show adults blatantly manipulating children for their own personal gain.
TL:DR
You don't understand why I brought up the case so you misrepresent me as chud who is blaming the JOOOOS for trannies. John Money approved of Transgenderism and there's no evidence (as far as I've seen) that proves otherwise.
