[1 / 1 / 1]
Quoted By:
>Hey OP, this is an excellent post you made here! I'd be happy to go over these with you. The first one is part of Jesus’s prophecy of the Fig Tree, and refers to the generation that sees the creation of the Modern State of Israel.
>Your interpretation of "race" instead of how its translated, "genealogy", is just that - an interpretation.
>The second one refers to the glorified, spiritual body that he had post-ressurection.
>The third one is just completely unrelated to your topic, so not really important here. That being said, the crucifixion of Jesus Christ at the hands of Pontius Pilate and the Jews is one of the most well-attested events in all antiquity, and there are three strong inductive historical arguments supporting the Ressurection as well, which have to do with the empty tomb, eyewitness sightings of Jesus, and the origin of the Christian faith, which was anathema to the Jews at the time.
>Anyways, I know there's a lot of stuff out there about how Jesus was a myth, or various other theories. They're all based on pseudo-science, shoddy archeology, or debunked hypotheses, i.e., the disciples stole the body, apparent death etc.
>At the end of the day, Jesus definitely existed, and there are some key facts about his life that we know for sure, even more certainly than Ceasar or Plato or other figures who everyone knows existed.
>Even wikipedia is forced to admit:
>Virtually all scholars of antiquity accept that Jesus was a historical figure, and attempts to deny his historicity have been consistently rejected by the scholarly consensus as a fringe theory.[6][7][8][9][10]
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_Jesus
>New Two Witnesses Prophecy just dropped:
>https://twowitnessesofrevelation.blogspot.com/2022/11/scientism-one-world-religion-youve-been.html
>Your interpretation of "race" instead of how its translated, "genealogy", is just that - an interpretation.
>The second one refers to the glorified, spiritual body that he had post-ressurection.
>The third one is just completely unrelated to your topic, so not really important here. That being said, the crucifixion of Jesus Christ at the hands of Pontius Pilate and the Jews is one of the most well-attested events in all antiquity, and there are three strong inductive historical arguments supporting the Ressurection as well, which have to do with the empty tomb, eyewitness sightings of Jesus, and the origin of the Christian faith, which was anathema to the Jews at the time.
>Anyways, I know there's a lot of stuff out there about how Jesus was a myth, or various other theories. They're all based on pseudo-science, shoddy archeology, or debunked hypotheses, i.e., the disciples stole the body, apparent death etc.
>At the end of the day, Jesus definitely existed, and there are some key facts about his life that we know for sure, even more certainly than Ceasar or Plato or other figures who everyone knows existed.
>Even wikipedia is forced to admit:
>Virtually all scholars of antiquity accept that Jesus was a historical figure, and attempts to deny his historicity have been consistently rejected by the scholarly consensus as a fringe theory.[6][7][8][9][10]
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_Jesus
>New Two Witnesses Prophecy just dropped:
>https://twowitnessesofrevelation.blogspot.com/2022/11/scientism-one-world-religion-youve-been.html
