>>16738693>Yes it does. You claimed Europeans and Asians only differentiated 22000 years ago and are genetically close to each other. That's total rubbish.no I didn't. do you know how this website works? we have IDs you know.
>It isn't, they overlap completely with each other. Modern Celts are closer to ancient Anglo Saxons than modern Englishmen, and modern Englishmen are closer to Iron age Celts than modern Irish Welsh and Scotsmenpoint gone completely over your head
at this point you haven't responded to my core argument whatsoever. I don't think you're even reading it. you're more obsessed with "winning an argument"("get destroyed!" "I accept your concession.") than any representation of truth. it's very boring to engage with.
if you're interested in actually addressing my refutation here it is
>>16738681so far you haven't. all you did is post an irrelevant article in an attempt to refute something someone else entirely was saying. I don't think you read a word. you can ramble on about "muh ad hominem", but yes, trying to talk to someone who doesn't read what you are saying is a VERY low level of discourse.
