>>16755750>The gospel counts as direct, its a collection of books with multiple witnessesNonsense. None of the Gospel authors claim to be witnesses, and in any case they were written to late to be written by witnesses.
Oh, and there's the tiny problem that they are all redactions of each other
>As for the Septuagint that was the OT, nothing from the NT was in it Lol guess again, Mark is plainly a redaction of various parts of the Septuagint, word-for-word identical in some places with just the names changed. Of course, if you had read a single book on the subject you would already know this
>plus it says Jesus would be born of a Virgin Lol WTF, I'm pretty certain that no OT manuscripts make any claims about Jesus being born, from a virgin or otherwise
>Even the bhuddah doesn't have an outside sourceYes, we all know that the Buddha is legendary. Stop trying to deflect attention from your own failings mate
