>>16768362She doesn't have to explicitly state her beliefs for you know to she's in that ideologic sphere, just check out where her supporters lean on politically vs her opponents.
>>16768363Why would he be an hypocrite for calling out the sexist behavior of someone whose political beliefs so far hinting to be around that spectrum where sexism and body shaming is shunned? He could have wrote in it in his tryhard macho style so he would still retain his manliness. It take all the criticizing eyes back from him onto her and it would a create a controversy around her and she would either have to double down or have to make a statement clarifying his stance on this issue and apologize to his woke crowd, either way making her look bad. It's a wasted perfect opportunity.
