>>16979161I've read the study and you didn't, because you are a lazy chav who likes to boast on the internet without getting into any details
here's conclusion from the study:
Although our findings support
Franco-Peredes’ conclusion that
vaccination status should not replace
social and physical public health
mitigation practices, the above
clarifications explain why our findings
do not support his assertion that
mandatory vaccination of health-care
workers would not reduce nosocomial
SARS-CoV-2 transmission.
In other words people who wrote this meta-analysis disagree with premise that vaccine does not decrease transmission rates [in heatlh-care workers]
