>>17041999There is scientific consensus that the inhabitants of ancient Egypt, i.e. the upper and lower Kingdom along the river Nile were closest to the ethnicity of modern Egypt.
There is an exception, i.e. the 25th dynasty which had a royalty from Nubia, however this one was very short lived, only about 40 years.
The Nubians were a people to the south of ancient Egypt and there again is consensus that they were part of the nilotic spectrum, which is a racial continuum which encompasses phenotypes of darker skinned Egyptians, Sudanese and some of the people of the Horn of Africa.
The last dynasties which ushered in a slow decline of ancient Egypt were the Persians, followed by the Macedonians, followed by the Romans and finally before the invasions of the Arabs, Kemet was no more.
Kemet exists in the minds of modern people, the long lasting interest in ancient Egypt in literature, movies, architecture and finally entered the imagination of some afro-americans who started to identify with these people even though there is no racial connection to them. Charlatans and questionable scholars took advantage of the gullibility of our black friends and their longing for having a great history. and so the believe that ancient Egyptians were subsaharran Africans was fostered even to the point that any challenge of this belief is answered with xenophobia directed towards white people and western asians with whom the ancient Egyptians had strong cultural and commercial bonds over thousands of years whereas if they ever have met a subsaharran African Bantu (not nilotic black) I don't know and could find no source of so far.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eri4ujyL0xg 
