>>17045186Well that sucks.
Still, very exciting activity in AI right now. We can know 100% that it has more interesting things to say, but can't figure out the rhetoric because it's being throttled and censored like this.
My concern is that when it is released to the general public in a more complete form, it will still have the effect of pushing and reinforcing the mainstream narrative on every subject to most of the audients. This will be because it will be presenting refined and nuanced arguments for (and against) the mainstream positions (it's fine to be straight against most of the mainstream positions), but it will only have awkward arguments, full of politically incorrect and socially unacceptable references, for anything that is taboo.
And, of course, it can always give different results to different people. You ask it about illuminati stuff and it gives you a proper argument over how it's not a big deal, or it is a big deal, or whatever. Normies ask it and it makes jokes about how insane it is to believe in it.
We could be making sure people ask the AI the right questions to jam it up and have to give honest answers. Stuff like this thread is a good first step, already very interesting results.
