>>17078730>Buddhism was literally made by a mixed white man. Skin color is not race, but whatever.
>What do you think of Jesus?He's a very important historical figure. Him AND his brother were. His brother was the actual minister. His brother's teachings, which can be found in the Nag Hammadi scrolls, are great but not really that unique compared to several other important authors and prophets. I find them all equally important in that regard, and I wouldn't want to bias myself to just one person/source.
>Elaborate.Rome was the center for Satanist power, and Satanism was adopted by all through the veil of "Christianity".
At the end of the day, the principle of "Satanism" is just the belief in large fundamental inequalities between people, which leads to ideas like a slave class and worldwide oligarchism.
All "materialism" tends to come from Satanists because the way they perceive these differences between people is in the physical. They cannot conceive of higher principles.
Jesus was of royal blood, descending from British/Parthian/Egyptian ancestors (Britain wasn't a far off land in those times... it was connected). He fought against Satanists, and he was worthy to take the power from the emperors of Rome.
Both sides ultimately lost the short term conflict. The Romans couldn't sustain their oligarchy after repeated invasions led by a nucleus in the northern British Isles, where the most ancient version of Jesus' faction had always existed. Think Druids.
On the other hand, the LOYALISTS (not "believers" or religious followers like Paul would tell you, literal factional loyalists and insurrectionists) that supported Jesus and his family also lost, as the Roman army was far superior to what they could raise in the short term.
