>>17131950Schön. Was ich meinte ist, dass der Turm von Babel an sich ein Versuch war Perfektion zu schaffen ähnlich wie Iţkuîl das versucht, aber daran scheiterte. Und der Turm von Babel sei auch der Grund, warum es verschiede Sprachen gäbe und warum diese in verschiedene Mundarten und Umgangsprachen verfallen.
>I don't think it is learnable simply because of how complex it is.Maybe it's just the fact that there are no native speakers, there is no content to consume, it is uncertain whether the language will ever have any use and is even learnable, thus not giving the learner much motivation to learn it. I would say that it is in theory learnable, all the grammar exists in real languages, the question is just whether the human brain is even able to digest information quickly enough to even quickly enough construct complex grammatical terms at the normal speed of a conversation.
>Though, my pet theory is that far in the past proto-languages had very complex phonologies because when we started speaking we used every sound our mouth could produce. Only later did phonologies start shrinking.I don't really have enough knowledge about primitive languages to make a judgement about it. I would guess that early phonologies were simple, and then added certain phonemes whenever it made sense for the phonology to move in that direction. After all all accents are just people being used to using certain areas of the mouth over others.
