>>1716247Why would you take the very uncharitable view that I wasn't aware of that when you could just consider it as a spot of unpolluted water in the sea of filth? I.e. it does not have the filth. I mean I understand that would be untenable as the filth would mix and I considered that but I thought, you know, who cares?
Since I'm thinking about it more, it might actually be beneficial to the metaphor that the filth would mix in eventually because I currently view [s4s] as a temporary phenomena that will eventually be taken over by the typical attitude of the other boards on this site, particularly with the very significant influx of new users we've seen over the last two years.
