>>17170993Actually it's a faithful and precise scale model, between about 1:6 and 1:10, of the LEM you're looking at in both these frames.
>>17170998moon landings were fake numbnuts
>>17171007kill yourself
>>17171009There are many differences that should not be
>>17171010Yes, but it was the same camera and landscape in both frames, neither would have changed in any way. Yet there is discoloration, arching of the landscape, objects have moved and change position, and spots on the lens appear to have gone, among other things. In the live footage there is also vibration in the frame that wasn't present previously.
>>17171013They were both obtained in exactly the same way, or so we're told. From the TV camera on the abandoned LEM beamed to earth by the satellite aerial attached. The only difference between each would be the time, one was earlier, the other later. The camera was shut off for a few hours and then switched on again for take-off. The astronauts did not exit the LEM in the meantime.
What follows is the infamously fake looking take-off.
