[79 / 17 / 38]
Quoted By: >>17198067 >>17198069 >>17198071 >>17198074 >>17198075 >>17198078 >>17198081 >>17198082 >>17198083 >>17198085 >>17198086 >>17198095 >>17198111 >>17198113 >>17198114 >>17198115 >>17198126 >>17198128 >>17198132 >>17198138
Genesis seems to be perfectly clear that Cain is the Son of Adam and Eve, not of Satan. However, it is commonly stated that Abel and Seth were the only true Sons of Adam and Eve, and that Cain was born due to Eve being seduced by Satan.
The idea that Cain is the Son of Satan extends to the idea that the Biblical Israelites (Children of Adam) and the Biblical Canaanites (Children of Satan) are not of the exact same genealogy, and that the Israelites are the true people of God, and that the Canaanites are God's forsaken people, for which God prohibits the Israelites to procreate with. Isaac's son Esau disobeyed God's command and took wives from the Canaanite tribes once again and produced Edomites, which are said to be Modern day Rabbinical Jews.
So, was the Book of Genesis attempting to encrypt the idea that Cain is the Son of Satan? If so, why is it that they directly state that he is of Adam's seed?
The idea that Cain is the Son of Satan extends to the idea that the Biblical Israelites (Children of Adam) and the Biblical Canaanites (Children of Satan) are not of the exact same genealogy, and that the Israelites are the true people of God, and that the Canaanites are God's forsaken people, for which God prohibits the Israelites to procreate with. Isaac's son Esau disobeyed God's command and took wives from the Canaanite tribes once again and produced Edomites, which are said to be Modern day Rabbinical Jews.
So, was the Book of Genesis attempting to encrypt the idea that Cain is the Son of Satan? If so, why is it that they directly state that he is of Adam's seed?
