>>17342188I'd say that the omission of the multiplication sign indicates that 2(1+2) is one term and that parenthesis are being omitted, too. Division in any relevant domain is a binary operation, so it's
>6/ 2(1+2) = 6/(2(1+2))If it was written as
>6 / 2 * (1+2)it'd be computed
>(6/2)*(1+2)All that assuming whoever presents this isn't a CS sperg.
