>>17343796Sexbots will be banned, government cant afford to lose the tax revenue thats generated by mens desire to increase their wealth to attract and maintain female interest.
Production and consumption would fall off a cliff, as if men no longer felt invested in women, they would no longer support women financially, no longer get married, no longer support expensive government spending/welfare for women.
Walk down your high street, and notice how many stores are for females, and how many for males, it's not even close, most stores are selling products aimed at women, most products in those stores are aimed at women, more than 65% of high street shops are geared to female consumers.
Why would your average single man work a 60+ week, if he has no intention of being married or impressing females. A man can easily afford a good apartment, pay all his bills and have a chunck of change left over, if you take the woman out of his life.
Ask yourself this question: "what would a man rather do?"
(a) work a 35 hour week, and fuck a supermodel sexbot when ever he wants (unlimited sex), and have still have a chunck of disposable income at te end of the month.
(b) work a 60 hour week, barely get any sex from his nagging shrill Karen of a wife, eventually get divorced, lose his house, and spend the rest of his life paying alimony and child support.
If men stopped wifing up bitches, who do you think is going to pick up womens tab.....thats right the fucking government!!!
And now that men are spending less time sat in a fucking office cubicle, and more time fucking their sexbots and enjoying life, how is the government supposed to raise the money to support all these unwanted females. (and bare in mind these females have a votes, guess what they are going to vote for.......thats right YOUR MONEY!!!)
