[43 / 12 / 24]
Quoted By: >>17596765 >>17596766 >>17596767 >>17596768 >>17596769 >>17596770 >>17596772 >>17596774 >>17596775 >>17596776 >>17596777 >>17596781 >>17596783 >>17596791 >>17596793 >>17596795 >>17596796 >>17596797 >>17596799 >>17596800
Alright, redpill me on breast size. If you look at old paintings of women they had relatively small breasts. Are modern diets and environmental factors exposing genes that are more susceptible to growth disruption? Are large breasts an essentially defective trait brought about by civilization and urbanization? They're eye catching of course, but they're also useless. The breasts are supposed to grow during pregnancy, they don't need to be large at baseline. Pre-bras and reliable clothing, large breasts would have been very cumbersome.
Lastly, if applicable, what would this then mean about personality traits of large breasted women? Personally, unless they're very nicely shaped, breasts above normal sizes are not attractive. My instincts think she's either pregnant or dygenic.
Lastly, if applicable, what would this then mean about personality traits of large breasted women? Personally, unless they're very nicely shaped, breasts above normal sizes are not attractive. My instincts think she's either pregnant or dygenic.