[7 / 3 / 5]
Quoted By: >>17743997 >>17743998 >>17743999 >>17744000 >>17744001
Can /pol/ tell me one good reason why sexual relationships between men and boys should be illegal?
>they can't consent!1!11
Why? Sex is simple and doesn't require a high level of cognitive ability to engage in. Applying the concept of informed consent to sex is retarded.
Also, adolescents and even preteens are not that much less intelligent than adults are.
>da power imbalance is too high
First of all, a man and a boy are more equal than a man and a woman. Women are retarded and inferior, and no one objects when a man has sex with one of them. Secondly, why does this make a sexual relationship wrong and not all adult-minor relationships? Why does this principle only apply to sexual relationships?
>it will traumatize them even if they consent!1!11
This is a debunked pseudoscientific claim. Studies which purport to show a causal link between minor-adult sex and psychological harm use clinical samples and don't control for confounding factors, such as family environment and whether or not simple consent was present.
People claim there is a scientific basic to justify moral preconceptions all the time, like when "scientists" told people masturbation caused insanity. Now they claim all adult-minor sex causes insanity.
>they will get AIDS
No because pederasts don't have STDs. Only vanilla fags do.
>pedos are just le bad
No. I liked boys when I was a boy myself. It is just my sexuality. You can't make sweeping generalizations about minor attracted folk, just like you can't make them about homosexuals.
>every single man/boy relationship is le grooming
Grooming is a retarded post-hoc rationalization that anti-pedophile bigots come up with when they encounter a boy who enjoys his relationship with his older friend, they have to pretend he was "groomed" instead of accepting that some boys love men and that's just entirely natural.
You can not be progressive and be pedophobic at the same time. Do better.
>they can't consent!1!11
Why? Sex is simple and doesn't require a high level of cognitive ability to engage in. Applying the concept of informed consent to sex is retarded.
Also, adolescents and even preteens are not that much less intelligent than adults are.
>da power imbalance is too high
First of all, a man and a boy are more equal than a man and a woman. Women are retarded and inferior, and no one objects when a man has sex with one of them. Secondly, why does this make a sexual relationship wrong and not all adult-minor relationships? Why does this principle only apply to sexual relationships?
>it will traumatize them even if they consent!1!11
This is a debunked pseudoscientific claim. Studies which purport to show a causal link between minor-adult sex and psychological harm use clinical samples and don't control for confounding factors, such as family environment and whether or not simple consent was present.
People claim there is a scientific basic to justify moral preconceptions all the time, like when "scientists" told people masturbation caused insanity. Now they claim all adult-minor sex causes insanity.
>they will get AIDS
No because pederasts don't have STDs. Only vanilla fags do.
>pedos are just le bad
No. I liked boys when I was a boy myself. It is just my sexuality. You can't make sweeping generalizations about minor attracted folk, just like you can't make them about homosexuals.
>every single man/boy relationship is le grooming
Grooming is a retarded post-hoc rationalization that anti-pedophile bigots come up with when they encounter a boy who enjoys his relationship with his older friend, they have to pretend he was "groomed" instead of accepting that some boys love men and that's just entirely natural.
You can not be progressive and be pedophobic at the same time. Do better.
