>>17798099Yes this is true for the most part. Chimps are an interesting example. A study on alpha behavior among chimps turned the whole idea on its head and changed biology and animal psychology entirely. Alpha was always thought to mean might is right. But studying chimps they found that there were cases where the alpha was actually the smallest and barely did any of the fighting, what he had in all cases big chimp and small was the respect of his peers. Generally it was obtained through selflessness and leadership, the ability to solve conflicts and bridge peace among the tribe.
Meanwhile when chimps did come along who pushed their weight around to maintain power, in almost every case, either a beta uprising occurred shortly thereafter, or, a better chimp ran him off.
If we look at this and compare it to human societies it makes perfect sense. All the men who produced golden ages have not ever really been brutes, sometimes warriors, but never brutes. We call them kings, leaders, messiahs, etc.
We have an analog for the brute chimp in the form of men who use might is right to enforce their will on societies. Their rules always produce much harm, last a short period and are dissolved by the people finally having had enough.
We call them not alphas, but tyrants, and they are historys disgraced.
However, I do not believe the Jews are behind everything corrupting our world, so I disagree there. Agree with the rest though.
