>>17842472i really do hate it when semantic arguments are made for really clearly defined things
>nothing can existbut things exist even though people die
>time doesn't existtime still passes after people die
>death were to be a real thingdoes it mean the bit where your body ceases all vital signs and you get buried? seems real to me
>it would happen in the shortest time possiblethis is the break between any kind of sense and some weird ass tangent built on all the retarded wordplay it set up. not perceiving something doesn't make it not exist
>if death was infiniteit is a permanent state in which someone's rendered
>we would not exist right nowwhy the fuck not
>infinity has no endno shit
>infinite death has an endwhy and how would that look
>one only gets one lifename a non-deity that got more than one
>death state wasn't infinite before you were bornpeople exist as hypotheticals before their parents slam uglies, they're not dead
>why would it be infinite when you diebecause i've never seen anyone come back cunt and am not subscribing to whatever new age bullshit definition of life this thing proposed or whatever
>'pulled out of a death statok going to conclusion
>life is infinitenah
>matter can't be destroyed therefore consciousness maintains some permanent state somehownah
