>>17880226You are a retard. There is no genetic marker for DNA that specifically makes someone a race. That groups of people in a homogenous enough sample could be grouped more tightly is irrelevant to anything. The thing you posted deliberately tried to exclude all interbreeding, which muddies those samples. Further, even defining these origin points is arbitrary and ridiculous as what constitutes a "European" throughout human history has changed drastically.
Nowhere did I say we were all the same. I said race does not have a genetic marker, and I am objectively correct. The picture you posted doesn't even refute this statement.
I'm wasting my time even arguing this.
