>>17898969No, because gender does not share a 1:1 identity with selfhood or personality. It's like asking what someone's dominant hand is and getting "neither" in response. There is, of course, an exception that exists which also happens to pave over a hole in my metaphor: intersex people. But these people aren't "agendered", they often don't even share the same agenda, and find the way they're excluded from the conversation to be vulgar (which it is). In any case, to describe an intersex person as "agender" is beyond stupid, as they have BOTH kinds of sex cells. There is no condition where you entirely lack gender, there is just an identity based on malapropriation.
