>>17993155i guess in the grand scheme of things that's cheaper than just preserving them so that makes sense
also it's kinda funny how britain had to create like 15 different chieftain and challenger variants like on this image out of 5 tanks only 2 are not a challenger or a chieftain variant and they still are considered the weakest of the modern western tanks but they look hella cool especially the pre-challenger chieftains like mark 7 or whatever the latest chieftain they had
>>17993159tanks are supposed to only fight tanks just like in videogames isn't that obvious, and tanks have machineguns on them especially to engage lighter armoured vehicles like cars or humans which are also considered tanks because they got body armour just like tanks and low-caliber 5 or 7mm hand cannons