>>18037290Worship and sacrifices are mutually opposite, unless you are talking about the plebs revering sacral kings and erecting temples, in which case I think it is justified based on the origins of these people. They are correctly regarded as of the stock of the Gods and one of the Gods. Moving away from this idea has removed traditionalism from Europe, where it still exists around the world.
Religiosity did not exist in the same manner in ancient pagan traditions as it does in modern religions. The interaction with Gods is a transactional exchange, not a personal one, and you see many of the same practices in the Bible, especially the Old Testament.
Christ's regality backs up all sacral kings, and was used by Charles I to refuse to plead before a treasonous court, in that the old and new testament backed up his regality, obedience to Kings was mandated.
Christians (protestants maybe) were wont to interpret the ancient Pharoahs as anti-christ, but this was error on their part.
Many of Christ's words are word for word exactly the same as some ancient regal traditions, and lend credence in this context, hence my comment here:
>>18037261Messiah and Christ both refer to a sacral regality.
The tension between the Pope and Kings resulted in the downfall of much of Europe. Louis XIV is a rare exception, who regarded himself as Apollo, the Sun God and created much art regarding this.
This is what was suppressed via bolshevism and kike kingslaying.
There should be a way to accept that Jesus is a significant and real and divine figure without surrendering your ancestry and traditions. The ancestor worship charge against nobles has to be the most subversive one. This hodge-podge grafting of Christianity onto traditional Europe has led to complete demoralization in the long run, with much kike subversion I'll admit.
That is why I point to reformation both in Christianity and Islam that puts the traditional spirit and nobility foremost. We need the divine protection.
