>>18100521No. Some of the art is anachronistic. Some other bits of it are impossibly well preserved. The text is also gibberish. Also, at that place and time, they would have utilized other forms of supports, this is anachronistic too.
>>18100544Here, I would like to point out that the way it is written is incorrect. You can check other manuscripts of that time and the style is extremely different. And why did they leave half the pages blank? No one in their right mind would waste all that empty space (other side of every page).
I'm all for showing the world the evil of judaism but spreading fake books made by some arabs who barely understand what they do isn't going to be any productive.
t. historian
