>>18153380based is a subjective term in usage at this point according to the subjective preferences of a person, and generally has no reliable meaning anymore, much like most of the terms tossed around here all day these days.
Some anons think something is based only if it is completely void of any subversive kike or luciferian shit in it, which is a tall order when it comes to any films whatsoever.
I acknowledge that just about anything today produced is going to have at least some globohomo garbage in it, but I just don't let it affect me the way they intend it to. Can you say the same? I can't answer that about you, only you can.
I recently watched a movie called Memory with Liam Neeson in it. I enjoyed it. You might also.
For what it is, I also enjoyed the last part of John Wick, despite it's start of the last chapter being pretty bad and campy.
I also recently watched Law Abiding Citizen, which was pretty good except for the ending.
Recently rewatched Transporter 3 and enjoyed it for what it is, although it was pretty obvious the only reason youtube was showing it for free is because the attractive woman co star in the movie is Ukrainian and it's an attempt to get people to sympathize further with them through that. But like I said, I can see these things and catch them and not let it spoil the film for me. You might not.
